[xoo_el_action type="login" display="button" text="Login / Sign Up" change_to="logout" redirect_to="same"]

Urban and Old: Residential Energy Retrofit and Subsequent Savings Article

Urban and Old: Residential Energy Retrofit and Subsequent Savings Article

Marcus de la fleur, joined us recently for our  Weekly Wednesday Free CEU webinar Series.

If you missed this session, want to rewatch it, or want to share it with a friend or colleague, you can now do so, as the recording and an article on the topic are available below. 

What the session was about, according to our live attendees

The webinar provided attendees with practical insights into retrofitting older buildings—especially masonry structures—for improved energy efficiency and comfort. Participants learned about various insulation strategies, including the use of closed cell and open cell spray foam in combination to balance air sealing, vapor permeability, and thermal performance, as well as the importance of moisture management in every renovation step. The session highlighted real-world case studies, detailing how deep energy retrofits can succeed through careful planning, attention to detail in wall assemblies and HVAC choices, and innovative solutions like hexagonal core ERVs for better humidity and energy control. Attendees also became aware of the challenges posed by restrictive building codes, the need for knowledgeable contractors, and the financial considerations of large-scale upgrades. Importantly, the webinar reinforced that user behavior and ongoing maintenance ultimately determine the effectiveness of even the most advanced systems, emphasizing that the key to long-term efficiency lies in both technical choices and how occupants interact with their buildings.

Please help us keep these webinars and writings going by becoming a supporting GHI member or by making a donation. 

Article Based on Webinar*

 

This article explores the comprehensive process of retrofitting a historic masonry residential building for high energy performance and sustainability. Centered on a case study from Chicago’s West Side, it details the technical, strategic, and practical challenges of transforming a turn-of-the-century, multi-unit property into a near net-zero, healthy, and resilient home. The discussion covers building envelope upgrades, mechanical system optimization, moisture management, ventilation, renewable energy integration, and lessons for professionals and the general public aiming to decarbonize older housing stock. The article is intended for housing professionals, builders, contractors, and anyone interested in deep energy retrofits, balancing technical rigor with accessible explanations.

Retrofitting Urban Masonry Housing for a Sustainable Future: Lessons from a Deep Energy Retrofit

The transformation of legacy urban housing into energy-efficient, healthy, and sustainable residences is a critical strategy for addressing both the housing crisis and the urgent need to decarbonize the built environment. Older masonry buildings, which are abundant in many American cities, pose unique challenges and opportunities in this endeavor. Through a detailed case study of a deep energy retrofit of a 1902 masonry two-flat in Chicago, this article illustrates best practices, technical considerations, and real-world lessons for housing professionals, builders, contractors, and engaged citizens.

The Opportunity and the Challenge of Existing Housing Stock

Preserving and upgrading existing housing is vital for reducing emissions, supporting urban connectivity, and meeting rising housing needs. Existing buildings often suffer from excessive energy use, poor air quality, and deferred maintenance—issues that contribute to both environmental and social challenges. At the same time, their embodied carbon and location advantages (such as walkability) make them prime candidates for sustainable transformation.

Yet, the path to high performance in these structures is far from straightforward. Masonry walls, outdated windows, leaky envelopes, and legacy mechanical systems present complex interrelated problems. The case study building, a 4,500-square-foot, three-unit property, exemplifies these challenges but also demonstrates the potential for remarkable improvement through careful planning and execution.

Energy Baseline and the Priority of Envelope Improvements

A rigorous approach begins with establishing a baseline for energy performance. A blower door test revealed that the subject building leaked air at a rate equivalent to a 22-inch by 22-inch open hole in the wall—typical for its era but unacceptable for efficiency and comfort. Energy modeling underscored that space conditioning (heating and cooling) was the dominant energy load, directing focus to the building envelope as the most impactful area for intervention.

Envelope improvements encompassed insulation and air sealing of the basement floor, foundation walls, above-grade exterior walls, windows, doors, attic, and roof. Special emphasis was placed on moisture management, recognizing that improper insulation strategies can lead to condensation, mold, and structural damage. The solution required assemblies that preserved the drying potential of the walls in both directions.

Wall and Roof Assemblies: Technical Solutions for a Historic Masonry Building

The wall assembly selected for the project consisted of a “flash and batt” strategy: a one-inch continuous closed-cell foam layer (carefully chosen for vapor retarder—not barrier—properties), two inches of open-cell foam, and 3.5 inches of rockwool batts within the interior framing. This assembly provided robust insulation (R28-R40, depending on location) and targeted airtightness of 3 air changes per hour at 50 Pascals.

The roof was upgraded with two layers of polyisocyanurate boards above the deck and three layers of rockwool batts below, all air-sealed with drywall and vapor-retarding latex paint. This approach delivered an R-value of 60 while minimizing the risk of cold deck condensation and preserving the roof’s drying potential. The roof assembly also included details such as a dimple mat at the parapet to facilitate vapor venting.

These solutions, developed in 2009, would likely be complemented by even more advanced products today, such as smart membranes and alternative insulation materials. The key takeaway is the necessity of project-specific strategies, tailored to the building’s physical characteristics and performance goals.

Air Tightness and Windows: The Details That Matter

Air sealing was an exercise in diligence, requiring the building to be gutted to its masonry shell. All thermal bridges and penetrations were addressed, with deferred maintenance issues uncovered and resolved. The result: air exchange rates dropped dramatically from 13.9 to 0.62 air changes per hour at 50 Pascals—far exceeding the initial target and fundamentally improving comfort.

Window selection and installation are critical in high-performance retrofits. The project specified triple-glazed, airtight windows (0.2 cfm/sf or less), with a mix of fixed casement and awning styles to minimize air leakage and maximize manual ventilation options where needed. Installation was performed with meticulous air sealing, recognizing that poor installation can undermine even the best window products.

Mechanical Systems: From Gas to Efficient Electrification

The building’s mechanical transformation followed the envelope upgrades. Initially, a small, modulating gas boiler provided hydronic heating with low-temperature radiators and radiant floors. By 2016, the system transitioned to ductless cold-climate mini-split heat pumps, sized by updated energy modeling to avoid undersizing (causing discomfort) or oversizing (causing short cycling and poor dehumidification).

Mini-splits were located centrally in each unit to balance temperature distribution, with supplemental fans improving air mixing. The case study found that while temperature differentials remained minor (2-4°F), the key benefit was the mini-splits’ sufficient dehumidification during summer and continued operation during sub-zero winter conditions, albeit with reduced efficiency at extreme lows. Importantly, the mini-splits’ right-sizing allowed for predominant operation in “dry mode” rather than full cooling, maximizing comfort and minimizing energy use.

Despite these advances, the existing gas boiler remained as a backup and for domestic hot water production, due to code limitations and product availability. The ultimate electrification goal includes replacing the boiler with an air-to-water heat pump, further reducing fossil fuel dependency and enabling all-electric operation powered by on-site solar.

Ventilation and Indoor Air Quality: Essential for Healthy, Tight Homes

With high levels of air tightness, mechanical ventilation becomes non-negotiable for occupant health. The project implemented energy recovery ventilators (ERVs) with high efficiency, strategically located to supply fresh air to living spaces and exhaust from bathrooms. The ERVs’ balanced ventilation not only maintained indoor air quality but also minimized energy penalties by recovering both sensible and latent heat.

Special care was taken with duct sealing (using mastic and gasketed connections) and layout, avoiding returns in kitchens to prevent grease buildup in the ERV core. Range hoods were specified with low cfm to prevent depressurization, with code-compliant makeup air solutions considered for higher-capacity exhausts.

Performance Outcomes: Energy Use, Economics, and Comfort

After improvements, annual kilowatt-hour consumption per apartment was approximately half the Illinois average—including most winter heating. The installation of an 8.58 kW photovoltaic array further reduced net energy costs, bringing the building close to net zero in years when heat pumps provided the majority of heating.

Economic analysis revealed the heat pumps outperformed natural gas heating when paired with on-site solar, with annual savings exceeding $200 per apartment. Without solar, the economics fluctuated with utility rates but remained competitive. The payback period for the solar array was projected to reach positive returns within 7-8 years, after which the system would provide decades of ongoing savings.

Comfort improved dramatically, with stable indoor temperatures, controlled humidity, and fresh air—intangible benefits that reinforce the value of high-performance retrofits.

Moisture Management, Durability, and Lessons Learned

Moisture management emerged as a central theme throughout the retrofit. Wall and roof assemblies were designed to maintain bidirectional drying, with materials selected for appropriate vapor permeability. Low-tech monitoring—visual inspection of masonry and joints—proved sufficient, with no evidence of moisture problems over more than a decade of operation. Passive radon mitigation was integrated during basement upgrades as a precaution.

The project’s experience highlighted the importance of contractor selection and supervision. Green building competencies remain rare among contractors; success often depends on close collaboration, oversight, and mutual learning.

User Behavior, Controls, and Occupant Education

No retrofit is complete without addressing occupant behavior. The best technology can be undermined by habits formed in drafty, inefficient buildings. Education for tenants included utility cost transparency, training on ventilation systems, and guidance on optimal thermostat and system use. Building management monitored humidity via smart thermostats, intervening as needed to prevent mold risk.

In multi-unit or rental contexts, the variability of occupant choices can affect net-zero goals and energy performance. The experience suggests that user education, ongoing engagement, and smart controls are essential complements to physical upgrades.

Site and Water Management: Holistic Sustainability

Sustainability extended beyond the building envelope. The project incorporated low-flow fixtures, roughed-in graywater systems (pending code approval), and stormwater strategies such as rain gardens to mitigate combined sewer overflow risks—a significant urban challenge in Chicago. Site interventions were designed for future adaptability and integrated with the building’s resilience goals.

Looking Forward: Future-Proofing and Continuous Improvement

The case study underscores the value of strategic planning and future-proofing. Decisions made in 2009, such as hydronic system design and utility room layout, allowed for later integration of new technologies. Today’s broader array of insulation materials, air sealing products, and smart membranes would offer even more options for performance and durability.

Continuous improvement is part of the sustainable building journey. Plans for further electrification, equipment upgrades, and site enhancements remain underway, reflecting the evolving landscape of building science and technology.

Conclusion

Retrofitting historic masonry housing for energy performance, health, and sustainability is both a technical and human challenge. Success depends on a holistic approach—envelope upgrades, mechanical optimization, ventilation, moisture management, user education, and renewable integration—tailored to each building’s unique context. The lessons from this Chicago project provide a roadmap for housing professionals, builders, contractors, and the general public committed to transforming the existing housing stock into resilient, low-carbon, and livable homes.

For further information and resources, Green Home Institute remains committed to empowering professionals and residents to make informed, sustainable choices in building and renovation.

Key Takeaways

  • Deep energy retrofits of masonry housing can achieve dramatic improvements in energy performance, comfort, and health while preserving embodied carbon and urban infrastructure.
  • Building envelope improvements—insulation, air sealing, high-performance windows—are the foundation of sustainable retrofits and must be tailored to each project’s unique challenges.
  • Moisture management and vapor permeability are critical considerations in all envelope assemblies, especially for historic masonry structures.
  • Mechanical systems, particularly right-sized heat pumps and energy recovery ventilation, are essential for decarbonization and indoor air quality in tight homes.
  • Renewable energy, such as photovoltaics, delivers substantial operating cost savings and supports net-zero goals when paired with envelope and system upgrades.
  • Contractor expertise and hands-on quality control are necessary to ensure proper installation and system performance.
  • Occupant behavior and education significantly influence real-world energy savings and comfort; smart controls and ongoing engagement are vital.
  • Site and water management, including stormwater mitigation and future-proofing for water reuse, contribute to holistic sustainability.
  • Retrofitting is an ongoing process; strategies should prioritize adaptability and incorporate emerging technologies and practices.
  • Strategic planning, data-driven decision-making, and collaboration across disciplines are key to successful, scalable energy retrofits.

Additional Questions and Answers not in the webinar 

Q: Are the Fujitsu heat pumps still working ten years later?
A: Yes, they still work great.


Q: Marcus, would you share the total project cost and whether you received any grants?
A: $180,000 general deep energy retrofit budget, $15,000 back porch rebuild, $17,000 re-roofing, $15,000 cornice and parapet repair, $30,000 solar roof array, $14,000 for three ductless minisplits. Rebates: $1,500 in Energy Star rebates, $1,500 insulation rebate, $1,450 heat pump rebate, 30% Federal tax credit on solar array installation, $9,300 state rebate on solar array installation.

Q: How many attendees were there today? Nice presentation.
A: 200.

Q: How many and what type of water heaters did you use? Could a hybrid water heater be installed in the garden level to reduce humidity?
A: We have one indirect fired water heater for the whole building (120 gallon insulated storage tank).

Q: Do you recommend a smaller, typical air-forced HVAC system with better air sealing/exterior insulation so that the user learning curve is reduced or eliminated?
A: I personally have a deep-seated dislike for forced air systems, and as such it was never on my radar or an option for us. As such, I don’t really have any recommendations I could pass on.

Q: Given everything you’ve learned and experienced, what would you do differently given today’s updated technologies and evolving building science for masonry retrofits like yours (new insulation types, heat pump advances, airsealing products, etc.)?
A: I probably would sequence some of the improvements and tasks differently (more effectively). I would go with a different, more reliable check valve (backwater valve) system from the outset. Rather than applying insulation uniformly across the interior walls, I would increase the insulation in those rooms where I had the space to do so.

Q: Pipe insulation from big box stores has been seen to be short-lived and still externally hot to the touch. Did you use a better grade of pipe insulation?
A: Yes, I used professional grade elastomeric pipe insulation and fittings.

Q: Can you talk a little more about why you incorporated the layer of open cell spray foam? Understood that minimizing the closed cell thickness avoids it becoming a vapor barrier, but open cell spray foam doesn’t really have a much better R value than mineral wool batts. Why not just add more mineral wool instead of open cell?
A: I wanted the potential heating season dew point to be in the spray foam and not the rockwool insulation to minimize condensation and bulk water issues.

Q: Window saddle heat pumps seem to be a coming technology that is much easier and therefore less expensive to install. They are not possible to fit with crank windows at this point. How would you weigh the heat retention advantages of crank windows versus the convenience and expense advantages of saddle heat pumps?
A: I personally would take a systems approach here, and not just look at the potential lower cost of a saddle heat pump. If just looking at cost, a saddle heat pump may be a short-term fix, but not necessarily cost-effective in the long run.

Q: How did you manage the behavioral learning curve with your tenants?
A: It’s an ongoing process. What I noticed is that demonstrating the potential cost savings will more reliably lead to behavior changes—particularly in this economy.
 
*Content created by a human speaker, transcribed by Zoom, and arranged by an AI LLM
 

Recent Posts

Categories

Archives

Register a LEED Project

Get the GreenStar Checklist